<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand Recognition: Why Labels Shouldn&#8217;t Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: enobytes</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-10164</link>
		<dc:creator>enobytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-10164</guid>
		<description>EXCELLENT point Neil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXCELLENT point Neil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Barham</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-10162</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-10162</guid>
		<description>I have one change that I would love to see and think that&#039;s very important, WHO ACTUALLY OWNS IT- I am tired of buying what I thought was a family produced wine only to find out that its from the likes of Gallo or Trichero, the latter uses a allusion of being family owed and produced-i.e. MacMurray. What&#039;s next? Large produce farmers putting family names on their industrial produce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one change that I would love to see and think that&#8217;s very important, WHO ACTUALLY OWNS IT- I am tired of buying what I thought was a family produced wine only to find out that its from the likes of Gallo or Trichero, the latter uses a allusion of being family owed and produced-i.e. MacMurray. What&#8217;s next? Large produce farmers putting family names on their industrial produce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David van Rooyen</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>David van Rooyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>It must be noted that the printing equipment is not at stand still new improved presses with many engineered upgrades are produced every year.New inks improved foil all make to use this technology to design a better label.The use of high tech equipment improved design software will lead to the evolution of the wine label industry.Marketing will always use technology to advance the products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be noted that the printing equipment is not at stand still new improved presses with many engineered upgrades are produced every year.New inks improved foil all make to use this technology to design a better label.The use of high tech equipment improved design software will lead to the evolution of the wine label industry.Marketing will always use technology to advance the products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>As a business manager of a wine label printing company I have seen many of the scenarios described in this thread played out on daily basis. 

There are multiple segments within the wine industry, each having it own unique business characteristics. Large wineries have a tendency to actively create new brands and re-design in hopes of gaining market share. Small botique wineries will typically tend to have a label that is crafted to reflect the wine and the estate at which it is bottled.

With digital printing now main stream in the wine industry it is now much more cost effective for large wineries to introduce new brands into the distribution stream. At the same time small botique wineries can benefit from the same high resolution, foil and embossing, and sequential numbering that was once reserved for larger quantity labeling projects.

Is it necessary to change a label? The anwswer is as varied as the wine industry itself. One thing is for certain with advances in technology it is getting easier and less expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a business manager of a wine label printing company I have seen many of the scenarios described in this thread played out on daily basis. </p>
<p>There are multiple segments within the wine industry, each having it own unique business characteristics. Large wineries have a tendency to actively create new brands and re-design in hopes of gaining market share. Small botique wineries will typically tend to have a label that is crafted to reflect the wine and the estate at which it is bottled.</p>
<p>With digital printing now main stream in the wine industry it is now much more cost effective for large wineries to introduce new brands into the distribution stream. At the same time small botique wineries can benefit from the same high resolution, foil and embossing, and sequential numbering that was once reserved for larger quantity labeling projects.</p>
<p>Is it necessary to change a label? The anwswer is as varied as the wine industry itself. One thing is for certain with advances in technology it is getting easier and less expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1996</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 20:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-1996</guid>
		<description>Before getting into the wine business managing brands, I used to do rebranding for professional sports teams.  Pro teams used to rebrand for one reason only: to create a retail sales spike.

Ultimately that&#039;s why anyone would rebrand, and in the wine business it is getting so competitive that large wineries think a new label is going to increase sales.  It&#039;s a common mindset for many businesses.  Not to mention there are a ton of design houses selling the idea of rebranding because they need the work.

Unfortunately, in the end the brand becomes watered down.  It&#039;s true with sports teams, it&#039;s true with wineries and it&#039;s true with many businesses.  The more you change the image, the more you lose customers who recognize your brand.  Customers have so many brands they see throughout any given day.  They remember wine labels by sight, not by name.

The strongest brands on the planet are ones that don&#039;t change.  Coke, United, Pepsi, UPS, NIKE, Starbucks, etc... these brands are strong because they have consistent brand recognition.  Jim&#039;s comments above are right on the money.  If a brand IS going to change, Gallo did the smart thing by gradually refining the look, and keeping customers who recognize their brand.

Your brand is one of the most valuable things you have.  Managing it for long term growth takes finesse and careful orchestration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before getting into the wine business managing brands, I used to do rebranding for professional sports teams.  Pro teams used to rebrand for one reason only: to create a retail sales spike.</p>
<p>Ultimately that&#8217;s why anyone would rebrand, and in the wine business it is getting so competitive that large wineries think a new label is going to increase sales.  It&#8217;s a common mindset for many businesses.  Not to mention there are a ton of design houses selling the idea of rebranding because they need the work.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, in the end the brand becomes watered down.  It&#8217;s true with sports teams, it&#8217;s true with wineries and it&#8217;s true with many businesses.  The more you change the image, the more you lose customers who recognize your brand.  Customers have so many brands they see throughout any given day.  They remember wine labels by sight, not by name.</p>
<p>The strongest brands on the planet are ones that don&#8217;t change.  Coke, United, Pepsi, UPS, NIKE, Starbucks, etc&#8230; these brands are strong because they have consistent brand recognition.  Jim&#8217;s comments above are right on the money.  If a brand IS going to change, Gallo did the smart thing by gradually refining the look, and keeping customers who recognize their brand.</p>
<p>Your brand is one of the most valuable things you have.  Managing it for long term growth takes finesse and careful orchestration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enobytes</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1964</link>
		<dc:creator>enobytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-1964</guid>
		<description>Excellent points Jim.  Thanks for the comments and the words of wisdom. 

Your point on Mr. Boston Brandy really hits home; opening the door for competitors to move in on your territory is the last thing you want to do; unfortunately, it can happen with a major label change. Thanks for sharing.

Pamela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Jim.  Thanks for the comments and the words of wisdom. </p>
<p>Your point on Mr. Boston Brandy really hits home; opening the door for competitors to move in on your territory is the last thing you want to do; unfortunately, it can happen with a major label change. Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p>Pamela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lit</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1963</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-1963</guid>
		<description>After spending 40 years in the wine &amp; liquor business mostly as a wholesale salesman, I have dealt with label changes.  Probably the worst company was Sebastiani when they would change labels on their wines such as Talus, Heritage, Nat. Creek the way a baby diaper would get changed.  Then they would expect the retailer to put the new label version in and to close out the old label.  Retailers were and are not that stupid. 

The worst single brand label change was Mr. Boston Brandy. That brand had been built on a distinctive label that had not been changed for years and years. Then they haul out a new label without keeping any of the face of that well-known old label and then I saw as long time consumers of that brand would not buy the new package and those who did swore they changed the taste.  Even bar owners where that brand was the number one call brand even questioned whether there was a taste change. That of course, opened the door for competitors who quickly moved into a market they had never been able to penetrate.

On the other hand, I watched Gallo change their generic wine to Livingston Cellars smoothly by making it a gradual change over a period of time. They maintained the basic struture of the label and by increasing the Livingston font and at the same time reducing the Gallo font until the Gallo name disappears off the label. They also used that formula with some of their other old line brands.

Every marketing genius should study that model as a way to accomplish the label change they are planning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After spending 40 years in the wine &amp; liquor business mostly as a wholesale salesman, I have dealt with label changes.  Probably the worst company was Sebastiani when they would change labels on their wines such as Talus, Heritage, Nat. Creek the way a baby diaper would get changed.  Then they would expect the retailer to put the new label version in and to close out the old label.  Retailers were and are not that stupid. </p>
<p>The worst single brand label change was Mr. Boston Brandy. That brand had been built on a distinctive label that had not been changed for years and years. Then they haul out a new label without keeping any of the face of that well-known old label and then I saw as long time consumers of that brand would not buy the new package and those who did swore they changed the taste.  Even bar owners where that brand was the number one call brand even questioned whether there was a taste change. That of course, opened the door for competitors who quickly moved into a market they had never been able to penetrate.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I watched Gallo change their generic wine to Livingston Cellars smoothly by making it a gradual change over a period of time. They maintained the basic struture of the label and by increasing the Livingston font and at the same time reducing the Gallo font until the Gallo name disappears off the label. They also used that formula with some of their other old line brands.</p>
<p>Every marketing genius should study that model as a way to accomplish the label change they are planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enobytes</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>enobytes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 03:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>Thanks For your comments Jonathan.  It&#039;s good to hear you&#039;ve had success in changing your labels. You make a valid point that it&#039;s not always necessary to make radical changes to make a difference; sometimes the smallest change is best. 

Regarding salient labels – on the opposing side, we have some wineries that have not changed their label in over 60+ years; take, for example Château Simone.  I don&#039;t particularly adore the label, but it&#039;s recognizable and its position in the marketplace is stable and established, which is only achievable with years of consistency (e.g. a quality product and stable packaging). 

The point I am trying to make is that wineries should focus more on creating a quality product and not worry so much about changing their label every other year. If sales are slipping, what is the root cause? Investigate and fix it; don&#039;t always assume it’s a marketing/label issue. 

BTW, Jonathan, since you&#039;ve gone through the label changing process, do you have any advice you would be willing to share with others on how to make a successful transition? 

I&#039;d love to hear everyone&#039;s label change success and failure stories, so if you have something to share, please respond!

Pamela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks For your comments Jonathan.  It&#8217;s good to hear you&#8217;ve had success in changing your labels. You make a valid point that it&#8217;s not always necessary to make radical changes to make a difference; sometimes the smallest change is best. </p>
<p>Regarding salient labels – on the opposing side, we have some wineries that have not changed their label in over 60+ years; take, for example Château Simone.  I don&#8217;t particularly adore the label, but it&#8217;s recognizable and its position in the marketplace is stable and established, which is only achievable with years of consistency (e.g. a quality product and stable packaging). </p>
<p>The point I am trying to make is that wineries should focus more on creating a quality product and not worry so much about changing their label every other year. If sales are slipping, what is the root cause? Investigate and fix it; don&#8217;t always assume it’s a marketing/label issue. </p>
<p>BTW, Jonathan, since you&#8217;ve gone through the label changing process, do you have any advice you would be willing to share with others on how to make a successful transition? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear everyone&#8217;s label change success and failure stories, so if you have something to share, please respond!</p>
<p>Pamela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Perceval Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/comment-page-1/#comment-1926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Perceval Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 01:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/12/21/brand-recognition-why-labels-shouldnt-change/#comment-1926</guid>
		<description>Why labels should not change, certainly made some valuable points, but the reality is some labels just need to change, as part of a rebranding or just simply because the original label is so no longer salient. The key to any change is that it needs to be evolutionary and this really is the key having been myself involved in changing the labels of a very well established brand, the art and to some degree the integrity of any label change is about not how far you go but how little you have to change things to make some difference for the better, this is assuming that you brand has any significant equity, it it does not then wholesale change may be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why labels should not change, certainly made some valuable points, but the reality is some labels just need to change, as part of a rebranding or just simply because the original label is so no longer salient. The key to any change is that it needs to be evolutionary and this really is the key having been myself involved in changing the labels of a very well established brand, the art and to some degree the integrity of any label change is about not how far you go but how little you have to change things to make some difference for the better, this is assuming that you brand has any significant equity, it it does not then wholesale change may be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
